Author Steven Galloway testifies that split was ‘amicable’ with former student

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

He told the court that he’d learned of the sexual assault allegation while he was in Ohio for an event in November 2015, and spoke with Annabel Lyon, who was acting chair of the creative writing department in his absence.

Improving relations

Canadian corporations encouraged to sign pledge for Indigenous reconciliation

1h ago

MAID

Government to exclude people who solely suffer from mental illness from medical assistance in dying

4h ago

residential schools

57 years later, Bobby Bird's journey home finally completed

7h ago

He says Lyon kept asking if he was suicidal, then police showed up to his hotel room on a report that he was a danger to himself and others, and he was handcuffed and committed to a psychiatric hospital for 72 hours.

“I kept saying to her, ‘No, I’m fine.’ At one point, I said, ‘Annabel, don’t worry. I’m way too much of a coward to kill myself,’ and that’s the kind of sense of humour I have.

“The next thing I know, there’s a knock on my door, and it’s the police.”

Galloway said he didn’t know where he was or what was happening, and “then I got put in the most terrifying place I’ve ever been in my life.”

He told the court that he believed his relationship with A.B. was marked by “enthusiastic ongoing consent,” but was shocked to learn she’d made a formal harassment complaint against him in the months after they ended their affair.

He said the woman was texting him “regularly” about social events, and said he was shocked to learn she had made the complaint “simultaneously.”

Galloway also recounted during his testimony that in 2013, the department was interviewing candidates for a tenured position, and A.B. had alleged that one of the people up for the job had “pulled her into an elevator, groped and choked her.”

He told the court that she didn’t want to make a formal complaint, but he and two other faculty members had “shamefully” lowered the candidate’s interview scores as a result, and they dropped out of contention for the position.

After A.B. sent an email to the creative writing department and some faculty members in November 2015 alleging administrative failures to deal with sexual violence on campus, Galloway said he believed she was referring to the elevator incident.

He said he phoned her to ask about the email, but she became “hostile” and hung up and had been posting on social media “articles about power dynamics and inappropriate relationships in both Canadian literature and university settings.

“And I just kind of thought, ‘Oh, jeez, maybe she’s upset about our relationship,'” Galloway said.

He testified that while he was not the chair of the program at the time, he was a faculty member, and she was a student, “and I shouldn’t have done it.”

A.B. is not testifying in the case, citing her mental health.

Galloway was questioned by his lawyer on Tuesday and has yet to be cross-examined by counsel for the defendants.

Earlier in the hearing on Tuesday, Galloway’s wife testified that her husband was “gutted” after being accused of rape, and became extremely distraught as he repeatedly denied the allegations.

Katie Wagner told the court that before Galloway was accused of sexual assault, suspended, then fired from his teaching position, he was extroverted and socially active in the literary community.

She said he stopped playing piano and reading and writing after his career was derailed by the allegations, which would resurface repeatedly online after he was suspended in November 2015.

“He lost his writing career when he was accused of sexual assault, when every single time we tried to put out a different sort of thing, somebody came back and said that it was a sexual assault,” she said.

“His whole world was about the Canadian literary community.”

Justice Neena Sharma began the second day of the trial in Vancouver by granting continued anonymity to the defendant in the long-running defamation case, first filed in 2018.

The judge said A.B. has shown that identifying her would carry objective harms and specific risks, and allowing anonymity is in line with protecting the privacy and dignity of sexual assault complainants.

Sharma said the woman has withdrawn her defence of her statements against Galloway as justified, but has not admitted that her accusations are false and the court can’t make assumptions until it hears all evidence.

The court heard on Monday that the woman received hateful and vitriolic messages after she was identified in news articles related to the author’s lawsuit.

A.B. had sought an indefinite order to keep her identity under a publication ban, but Sharma’s order will expire within six weeks of a ruling in the case, although she can apply to extend it.

Sharma said A.B. is not participating in the trial due to her fragile mental state, which has included suicide attempts, though she’s shown “resilience” dealing with past proceedings before the trial.

The court has heard from both Galloway’s and A.B.’s lawyers about their clients’ mental health struggles, including suicide attempts, in the years since the accusations became public.

Galloway’s lawsuit was originally filed against numerous defendants who allegedly defamed him online and in other forums by repeating unproven allegations of rape.

The court has heard that four defendants remain.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 6, 2026.

Darryl Greer, The Canadian Press